Legal Opinion

Luebke v. Vonnekold

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1947PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRector, J.

Two questions are presented:

1. Is the status of a married woman for the purpose of the exemption provided by sec. 246.09, Stats., to be determined as of the time the insurance is caused to be made payable to her or may it be determined as of the time the proceeds are payable ?

2. Was the insurance on Kern’s life effected by him or another person and caused to be made payable to the respondent by the one who effected it, within the meaning of sec. 246.09, Stats. ?

The applicable provisions of the statute read:

“ (1) Any married woman may, in her own name or in the name of a third person as her…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chatham Phenix National Bank v. CrosneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Julius v. DruckreyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Canterbury v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. AhernWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Vida Longevity Fund, L.P. v. GoldDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API