Legal Opinion
Hourigan v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided August 18, 1927No. A-5856PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.
The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Caddo county on a charge of setting up, to be used as a distillery, a still worm and substitute therefor, and he was sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and to be confined in the county jail for 30 days.
This is a companion case to case No. A-5855, 38 Okla. Cr. 10, 258 P. 1057, just decided, and the conviction rests on substantially the same evidence as the conviction in that case. Under the provisions of sections 2619 and 2626, Comp. Stat. 1921, in addition to his plea of not guilty defendant also filed a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Scribner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
- Estep v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
- Kent v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
- Hartgraves v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
- Hourigan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Heldenbrand v. MillsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1970
- Beaman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
- Kite v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973
- Vincent v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1942
- Love v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.