Legal Opinion

Hartgraves v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided March 21, 1911No. A-437PublishedCited by 37 opinions

Appeal from, District Court, Custer County; W. N. Maten, Judge. T. D. Hartgraves was convicted of receiving stolen goods, and bis punishment assessed at one year’s imprisonment, and he appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

FUEMAN PRESIDING Judge.

First. Defendant filed a motion in the lower court to set aside the indictment in this case upon the ground that F. A. Snodgrass was the duly elected and qualified county attorney of Custer county, and was in attendance upon the court and the grand jury when his presence was required during the term of the court at which this indictment was found, and_ there was no physical or mental disqualification which incapacitated said Snodgrass from performing his duty as such county attorney at said time, but that R. P. Phillips, a member of the bar, who was not the county…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. EdgertonDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1897
  2. Fletcher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Caples v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. United States v. KilpatrickDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1883
  5. Lewis v. . Commissioners of WakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. State v. AtkinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State Ex Rel. Ogden v. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  3. Coblentz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  4. Scribner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Commonwealth v. HarrisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API