Legal Opinion

Hourigan v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided August 18, 1927No. A-5855PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Caddo county on a charge of having the possession of mash fit for distillation, under section 1, c. 42, Session Laws 1924 (Special Session), and he was sentenced to pay a fine of $100 and to serve 60 days in the county jail.

The record discloses that at the time charged certain officers had discovered the parts of a still and a quantity of mash concealed in a canyon not far from the town of Carnegie. A few* nights later they lay in wait nearby, and during the night defendant, his uncle, father-in-law,…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Heldenbrand v. MillsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1970
  2. Hourigan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. Beaman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Kite v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973
  5. Vincent v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1942

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API