Hourigan v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.
The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Caddo county on a charge of having the possession of mash fit for distillation, under section 1, c. 42, Session Laws 1924 (Special Session), and he was sentenced to pay a fine of $100 and to serve 60 days in the county jail.
The record discloses that at the time charged certain officers had discovered the parts of a still and a quantity of mash concealed in a canyon not far from the town of Carnegie. A few* nights later they lay in wait nearby, and during the night defendant, his uncle, father-in-law,…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Heldenbrand v. MillsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1970
- Hourigan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
- Beaman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
- Kite v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973
- Vincent v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1942
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.