Legal Opinion
Larson v. Hazeltine
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided August 8, 1996No. NonePublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Per curiam
[¶ 1] Gerald Larson (Larson) appeals from an order quashing an alternative writ of mandamus and denying a peremptory writ of mandamus. We reverse.
FACTS
[¶ 2] Larson is a proponent of an initiative drive which would require an election ballot to reflect a candidate’s position on term limits (hereinafter referred to as “Initiative”). On May 6, 1996 a total of 999 petition sheets in support of the Initiative were received by the Secretary of State, Joyce Hazeltine. The Initiative was circulated by sixteen persons, including William Baisden (Baisden) and Russell Baggett (Baggett). Baisden and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- US West Communications, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Morford v. PyleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
- Nelson v. South Dakota State Board of DentistrySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- O'Brien v. PyleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
- Nist v. HersethSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Wagner v. TruesdellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Baker v. AtkinsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- AEG Processing Center No. 58, Inc. v. South Dakota Department of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Myears v. Charles Mix CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- White Eagle v. City of Fort PierreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.