Armando v. Armando
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—In a matrimonial action, the parties cross-appeal, as limited by their briefs, from stated portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Benson, J.), entered July 18, 1984, which, inter alia, directed the defendant husband to pay, in addition to maintenance and child support, "all unreimbursed balances for medical and dental expenses, if any”; awarded the defendant limited visitation of only one day per week with his three children; failed to specify a termination date for defendant’s maintenance payments; and failed to award the plaintiff her equitable share of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Majauskas v. MajauskasNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Daghir v. DaghirAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Daghir v. DaghirNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Damiano v. DamianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Rodgers v. RodgersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Sperling v. SperlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Price v. PriceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Otto v. OttoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Keehn v. KeehnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Pulitzer v. PulitzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.