Legal Opinion

Daghir v. Daghir

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 17, 1982PublishedCited by 134 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

The Appellate Division properly reversed the order of Family Court for error of law. The Family Court had based its decision only on a balancing of the interests of the husband and the wife without making any determination as to the best interests of the children — the legally dispositive issue. Because the Family Court did not consider this issue it can be said, as did the Appellate Division, that the Family Court erred as a matter of law. The appellate court then proceeded to exercise its…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Eschbach v. EschbachNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Weiss v. WeissNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Priebe v. PriebeNew York Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by134 opinions

  1. MATTER OF TROPEA v. TropeaNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Young v. YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Blake v. BlakeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. Cervera v. BresslerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. Twersky v. TwerskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API