Legal Opinion

Tidal Oil Co. v. Flanagan

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 7, 1924No. 179PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Taft

J. P. Flanagan sued the Tidal Oil .Company and Eleanor Arnold in the District Court of Creek County,' Oklahoma, to quiet his title to two tracts of land therein of eighty acres each. His title was based on a quitclaim deed of Robert Marshall, an allottee -and citizen of the Creek Nation, executed in October, 1916, after Marshall had attained his majority and had been discharged from guardianship.; The defendants derived their title from the same allottee, but the deed under which they claimed was made by Marshall when he .was 14 years old and married, and after he had been granted majority…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Patterson v. Colorado Ex Rel. Attorney General of Colo.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Burgess v. SeligmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Gelpcke v. DubuqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  4. McCullough v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. Douglass v. County of PikeSupreme Court of the United States · 1880

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tidal Oil Co. v. FlanaganSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Potomac Electric Power Co. v. Public Utilities Commission of District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
  3. Sambor v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Ragland v. McLane Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API