Legal Opinion
Vera v. Saks & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 31, 2006No. 04 Civ. 7502(RJH)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HOLWELL, District Judge.
Plaintiff Angel C. Vera brings this action against his former employer, Saks & Company (“Saks”), and his former union, United Storeworkers, Local 1102 (“Union”). As against Saks, plaintiff seeks damages arising from allegedly unpaid wages during his employment as a ladies’ shoe salesman. He alleges that Saks’s practice of accounting for refunds of certain returns of merchandise in the calculation of sales commissions was an unlawful deduction from employees’ wages in violation of section 193 of New York’s Labor Law. N.Y. Labor Law § 193…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Johnson v. D.M. Rothman Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Perkins v. 199 SEIU United Healthcare Workers EastDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Vera v. Saks & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Zeyer v. Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
- Baguidy v. Boro Transit Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.