Legal Opinion
Manfield & Firman Co. v. Manfield
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided October 5, 1932No. 14,604PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLockyear, J.
— The appellant is a corporation doing business in the City of Terre Haute, Indiana. One hundred and ninety-seven shares of the capital stock of the corporation was owned by the appellee, Ben Man-field, and 100 shares by one Frank Firman and two shares by one J. B. Schlossberger.
The business of the corporation was managed by Man-field and Firman; Manfield had the title of secretary and treasurer and Firman, that of president. Manfield received $6,800 per year, and Firman $6,500 per year, in full for all their services. Schlossberger received nothing, except $5 for each director’s meeting that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Palmer v. . Van SantvoordNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Claim of Bowne v. S. W. Bowne Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Matter of StrykerNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Leigh Aitchison, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
- Farmer v. St. Croix Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lasear, Inc. v. AndersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1934
- Solheim v. Hastings Housing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1949
- Rhoden v. Smith & Decker Electric Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1939
- Claypool Machine Co. v. CripeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1937
- MacShir Co. v. McFarlandIndiana Court of Appeals · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.