Legal Opinion

Solheim v. Hastings Housing Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1949No. 32540PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWenke, J.

This is an action arising under and by virtue of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. Selmer A. Solheim, as plaintiff, seeks to recover compensation benefits for injuries he claims he suffered in an accident while employed by the Kearney Construction Company and the Hastings Housing Company. The Anchor Casualty Company was made a party defendant because it is the workmen’s compensation insurance carrier for both of the other defendants.

On June 30, 1945, the Nebraska Workmen’s Compensation Court rendered a one judge award finding that at the time of the accident on February 11, 1944, plaintiff was…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Claim of Bowne v. S. W. Bowne Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Carville v. A. F. Bornot & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Leigh Aitchison, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Wilson v. Brown-McDonald Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  5. London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Anderson v. CowgerNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Hull v. Aetna InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Gifford v. AG Lime, Sand and Gravel CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1971
  4. United States Nat. Bank of Omaha v. RupeNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Franzen v. BlakleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1952

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API