Claypool Machine Co. v. Cripe
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
This is an appeal from an award of the full Industrial Board granting compensation to the appellees as dependents of Dick W. Cripe. The error assigned and relied upon is that the award of the full board is contrary to law. Under this assignment the appellants contend that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the finding and that the finding of facts is insufficient to sustain the award.
That part of the finding and award of the full board that presents the matter in controversy is as follows:
“And the Full Industrial Board having heard the argument of counsel, 'having reviewed the evidence…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re RaynesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
- Manfield & Firman Co. v. ManfieldIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932
- MacShir Co. v. McFarlandIndiana Court of Appeals · 1934
- Rehm v. CutshallIndiana Court of Appeals · 1934
- Kuhner v. Kuhner Packing Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1934
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bohn Aluminum & Brass Co., Plant 9 v. KinneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
- Evansville Veneer & Lumber Co. v. MullenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1946
- Motor Freight Corporation v. JarvisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- Hj Heinz Co., Etc. v. Chavez, Etc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1957
- Russell v. Auburn Central Manufacturing Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.