Nellis v. Pennock Manuf'g Co.
United States Circuit Court
Bill in Equity for an injunction against the infringement of certain patents. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMcKennan, C. J.
On the eighteenth day of December, 1866, letters patent No. 2,429, for “improvement in hay elevators,” were reissued to Edward L. Walker; on the twenty-ninth of May, 1866, reissued letters patent for “improvement in horse hay forks” were granted to Seymour Rogers, No. 2,260; and on the twentieth of March, 1866, letters patent No. 53,345, for “improvement in horse hay forks,” were granted to Seymour Rogers. The title to these several patents is alleged to be vested in the complainant, and they constitute the subjects of the present controversy. The bill alleges that the inventions described…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Bloomer v. MillingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
3Cited by12 opinions
- Wilkins Shoe-Button Fastener Co. v. WebbU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1898
- Nachod & United States Signal Co. v. Automatic Signal Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- Holliday v. Long Manufacturing Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1955
- Diamond Match Co. v. Ohio Match Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1897
- Johnson Railroad Signal Co. v. Union Switch & Signal Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1893
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.