Holliday v. Long Manufacturing Co.
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
GILLIAM, District Judge.
Plaintiff, owner of a patent on a tobacco harvester, sues defendants for infringement and asks for an injunction and damages. Defendants move to dismiss under Rule 12(b), 28 U.S.C.A., for failure to join an indispensable party, namely, Harrington Manufacturing Company, Inc., plaintiff’s licensee.
By written instrument plaintiff granted to the Harrington Company for the life of the patent “exclusive rights to manufacture and sell” the patented article. The agreement stated that the parties “may at their option jointly enter suit against other parties believed to be…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- United States v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Independent Wireless Telegraph Co. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Birdsell v. ShaliolSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Meese v. Eaton Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1964
- Ilyin v. Avon Publications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- Benger Laboratories Ltd. v. R. K. Laros Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1959
- Blacks v. Mosley Machinery Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
- In-TECH MARKETING INC. v. Hasbro, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.