Legal Opinion
Bloomer v. Millinger
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 18, 1864PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
68 U.S. 340 (1863)
1 Wall. 340
BLOOMER
v.
MILLINGER.
Supreme Court of United States.
Messrs. Seward, Norton, and Blatchford, for the appellant, Bloomer.
Mr. Justice CLIFFORD, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court:
Counsel of the complainant concede that the machines were constructed and put in operation by the consent and license of the assignees of the patentees, and that the respondent had the full right to continue to use and operate the same throughout the entire period of the extension granted by the Commissioner of Patents. But they deny that he had any right to continue to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bloomer v. McQuewanSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
- Wilson v. RousseauSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
- Chaffee v. Boston Belting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1859
3Cited by33 opinions
- Odetics, Inc. v. Storage Technology Corporation, Visa International Service Association, Inc., Visa Usa, Inc. And Crestar Bank, Inc., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Morgan Envelope Co. v. Albany Perforated Wrapping Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Intel Corporation v. Ulsi System Technology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Heaton-Peninsular Button-Fastener Co. v. Eureka Specialty Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.