Blydenburg v. David
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
STORCKMAN, Chief Justice.
This is a proceeding under § 564.444, subd. 2, RSMo Cum.Supp., V.A.M.S. 1965, Laws 1965, S.B. 45, § 4, to require the Director of Revenue to reinstate the plaintiff’s license to operate a motor vehicle. The trial court held that the Director of Revenue did not have the power and authority to revoke the plaintiff’s drivers license and the privilege of operating a motor vehicle because “said revocation was a violation of plaintiff’s constitutional rights under the provisions of the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of Missouri.” The…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Breithaupt v. AbramSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Gottschalk v. SueppelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Campbell v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. StarnesOhio Supreme Court · 1970
- Finley v. OrrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Robertson v. State Ex Rel. LesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
- State v. MayoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.