Walden v. Purvis
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Stanislaus County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Hayne, C.
Action against the sheriff for taking 111 head of cattle alleged to have been the property of the plaintiff, under attachment against plaintiff’s father. The plaintiff claimed eighty of the cattle under a salé from his father. Whatever errors may have been committed by the court in admitting or rejecting evidence in relation to these eighty cattle cannot be considered, *519because the court held the sale of those cattle to have been fraudulent and void; and so far as they are concerned, the judgment was in favor of the appellant.
The balance of the cattle, viz., thirty-one head, were…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cohn v. MulfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bollinger v. BollingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- First National Bank v. YoemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Wegerer v. JordanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- Wooton v. KeatonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
- Eppinger v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896