Legal Opinion · Dissent

Eppinger v. Scott

California Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1896No. 18429Published

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County and from an order denying a new trial. M. K. Harris, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Dissent

McFarland, J.,

dissenting.—I dissent, and adhere to the conclusion reached in Department.

Rehearing denied.

The following is the opinion of Department Two, rendered on the 7th of November, 1895, referred to in the dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice McFarland.

Britt, C.

Plaintiffs brought this action against defendant, who is the sheriff of Fresno county, to recover possession of a quantity of trays and sweat-boxes used in the curing of raisins. It is alleged in the complaint that plaintiffs own the property, and that defendant took the same from their possession. Defendant, by his answer, denied…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Oregon Steamship Co. v. . OtisNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Walden v. PurvisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Jones v. MorseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Landecker v. HoughtalingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API