Legal Opinion

Wegerer v. Jordan

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 5, 1909No. Civ. No. 603PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. B. N. Smith, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

This is an action to foreclose a mortgage on certain real estate given to secure the payment of a non-negotiable promissory note, which note and mortgage had been by defendants D. P. and Louise Jordan made and executed to their codefendants W. V. Holley and Jacob Meyer, and prior to the delivery of which defendants A. L. and Dora Rowe indorsed the same. The court gave judgment in favor of plaintiff against Holley and Meyer as prayed for, and gave judgment against plaintiff in favor of the other defendants, from which, and an order denying her motion for a new trial, plaintiff prosecutes this…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gordon v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Robertson v. ParksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892
  3. Deming v. DarlingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  4. Cohn v. MulfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Walden v. PurvisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  2. Everts v. MattesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Gutterman v. GallyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Williams v. LowenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Nunemacher v. Western Motor Transport Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API