Legal Opinion

Richards v. Gemco

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 3, 1963No. Civ. 26883PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

Plaintiff, while employed by defendant Southern Pacific, sustained injuries on property owned by defendant General Motors and serviced by Southern Pacific. Damages were demanded from Southern Pacific under the provisions of the Federal Employers Liability Act, and from General Motors for negligent maintenance of its premises. The instant appeal is presented on a settled statement (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 7 (b) * ). Therefrom it appears that plaintiff, following an adverse jury verdict, unsuccessfully sought a new trial on several stated grounds. One such ground was the asserted misconduct…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kollert v. CundiffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Litvinuk v. LitvinukCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Sherwin v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Irvin v. PadelfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Dunford v. General Water Heater Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hasson v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Alvarez v. Felker Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Clemens v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. MacColl v. Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Campbell v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API