Legal Opinion

Miller v. Hennen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 14, 1989No. C3-87-2056, C5-87-2057PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Chief Justice.

Respondent Robert Miller initiated this quiet title action in Dakota County to secure title to approximately 16 acres of uni-nhabitated land located in the City of Burnsville. The case was tried before the Dakota County District Court without a jury. The trial court ruled that Robert Miller was entitled to ownership of the property free and clear of any interests of appellant Comet Enterprises, Inc., subject only to the easement rights existing in the City of Burnsville. 1 The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s decision, holding that Miller was a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. City of Minnetonka v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Anderson v. Graham Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. Henschke v. ChristianSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  4. Board of Education v. HughesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  5. Fifield v. NortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Chergosky v. Crosstown Bell, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Lindquist v. Household Industrial Finance Co. (In Re Vondall)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  3. Claflin v. Commercial State Bank of Two HarborsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  4. Swanson v. SwansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Real Estate Equity Strategies, LLC v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API