Legal Opinion
In Re the Estate of Barg
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 30, 2008No. A05-2346PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEYER, Justice.
The Mille Lacs County Family Services and Welfare Department (County) filed a claim against the Estate of Francis E. Barg (Estate), seeking to recover Medicaid benefits correctly paid on behalf of his predeceased wife, Dolores Barg. The Estate partially allowed the claim, and disallowed the other part. The district court, concluding that Dolores Barg’s interest in the couple’s property was limited because she had conveyed it to her husband before her death, evaluated her interest as a life estate, and upheld the partial disallowance. The County appealed, arguing that it…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Harris v. McRaeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- H&W v. Cathie Peterson RE: The Estate of Melvin Peterson (deceased)Idaho Supreme Court · 2014
- Gretsch v. Vantium Capital, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. McCormickIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
- Meyer v. NwokediSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Duluth v. Brian LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.