Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Blum

United States Court of International Trade

Decided April 22, 1987No. Court 85-05-00640PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

AQUILINO, Judge:

This action has been brought pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1592 and 28 U.S.C. § 1582. Counts I, II and III of the complaint respectively allege fraud, gross negligence and negligence within the meaning of subsection (a) of section 1592 on the part of defendant Blum. Recovery of penalties provided for by subsection (c) thereof is sought against him on those counts. The complaint further alleges loss of duties as a result of the pleaded violations of subsection (a), and a fourth claimed cause of action seeks recovery of those duties against defendant Blum pursuant to 19 U.S.C.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. Federal Insurance Company and Cometals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  2. United States v. GordonUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
  3. United States v. Appendagez, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 1983
  4. United States v. RossUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
  5. United States v. Imperial Food ImportsUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. BlumCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  2. United States v. Jac Natori Co.United States Court of International Trade · 1993
  3. United States v. Snuggles, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 1996
  4. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
  5. TIE Communications, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API