Legal Opinion

Murray County v. Pickering

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 8, 1944No. 14921PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The county sought to establish that this road construction was done under the terms of a verbal contract, which later was reduced to a written memorandum; that, under the terms of the contract, Pick ering was an agent of the county and should account to it for such funds as he received to apply upon the project, less such amounts as were legally expended thereon; and that, as compensation, he was to be paid a '“reasonable sum for his services provided there is a sufficient fund left to pay same.” Pickering claimed that no such verbal…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harris & Mitchell v. Amoskeag Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Crim v. AlstonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  3. Owen v. PalmourSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  4. Koplin v. Shartle Bros. Machine Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1920
  5. McGinty v. PickeringSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wise, Simpson, Aiken & Associates, Inc. v. Rosser White Hobbs Davidson McClellan Kelly, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  2. Foster v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  3. Nhan v. Wellington Square, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  4. Payne v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
  5. Walea v. PierceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API