Legal Opinion

McGinty v. Pickering

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 2, 1935No. 10282PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

1. The funds in controversy were paid by the State Highway Department for the use of Murray County, as compensation for construction work performed by the county on a State road under a contract between the county and the State Highway Department. “All sums from whatever sources which are paid into the county treasury shall constitute a part of the county revenue.” Code of 1933, § 92-3901. In equity, these were county funds and should lie so treated, whether deposited in the name of the county or not, all parties concerned having knowledge of their source and of the consideration for which…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Booth v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  2. Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. OverbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  3. Mitchell v. LasseterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  4. McGinnis v. McKinnonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  5. Maddox v. County of RandolphSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Aiken v. ArmisteadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  2. Murray County v. PickeringSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  3. McGinty v. GormleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  4. Murray County v. PickeringSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  5. McGinty v. KeithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API