Legal Opinion

Harris & Mitchell v. Amoskeag Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 8, 1897PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Complaint. Before Judge Smith. Dodge superior court. March term, 1896.

1Opinion of the CourtLittle, J.

1. On or about February 1, 1889, Harris & Mitchell purchased or leased from McArthur, as surviving partner of McArthur & Griffin, the timber growing upon certain lots of land, at an agreed price per lot. Subsequently, as is claimed by Harris & Mitchell, plaintiffs in the present action, they in turn sold or leased the same timber to the Amoskeag Lumber Company, for an aggregate sum of money to be *642paid in installments at given intervals. After the negotiations were had between Harris & Mitchell and the Amoskeag Lumber Company, McArthur brought suit against Harris & Mitchell to recover the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harvey v. MorrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  2. Pershing v. CanfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
  3. Lacy v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Wilkinson & Wilson v. ThigpenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  5. Isler v. EggerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1852

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Albany Phosphate Co. v. Hugger Bros.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  2. Luke v. HillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  3. H. Weston Lumber Co. v. Lacey Lumber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Porterfield v. GilmerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  5. Koplin v. Shartle Bros. Machine Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1920

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API