Legal Opinion
In Re Tinsley
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 3, 1990No. 89-954PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEWMAN, Associate Judge:
This matter comes before us on the Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”). Involved are six separate matters, which have been consolidated for review. After evidentiary hearings on each of these matters, the Board found fifteen violations of the Disciplinary Rules and recommended that respondent be suspended for one year with reinstatement conditioned upon a showing of fitness to practice. We accept the Board’s findings, agree with its analysis, and adopt its recommendation.
I. Respondent’s Disciplinary Violations
Following is a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re KerseyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Matter of SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- In Re RoundtreeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Matter of FogelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- In Re O'DonnellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- In Re SteeleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- In Re RayDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- In Re LylesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- In Re TinsleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.