Legal Opinion
In Re O'Donnell
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 26, 1986No. 86-1011PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Per curiam
The Board on Professional Responsibility found respondent had violated DR 1-102(A)(5) for failure to respond to Bar Counsel’s inquiries; DR 6-101(A)(3) for neglecting to form a corporation and to file on behalf of the corporation an application for a liquor license within the specified time, and DR 7-101(A)(l) for deliberate and conscious failure to seek the lawful objectives of his clients despite his full awareness of the extent of those objectives. Respondent has not filed a brief before this court. We have reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the Board and find its findings are…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re RoundtreeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Matter of FogelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- In Re MorrisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re SlosbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- In Re LylesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- In Re UkwuDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- In Re ChisholmDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.