Peterson v. Nichols
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Yakima county, Holden, J., entered April 21, 1919, in favor of the defendants upon a counterclaim, in an action to recover money had and received.
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, C. J.
Peterson and Auld were jointly engaged in a general merchandise business, at Granger, Washington. Besides the stock of merchandise, which occupied leased buildings, they were the owners of certain real estate situated in the same city. L. H. Nichols was the owner of approximately seven hundred and forty acres of agricultural land, and personal property thereon, located in Boundary county, Idaho. In Sep*289tember, 1918, tbe parties, being Peterson and Anld on tbe one hand, and Nichols on the other, entered into negotiations for the exchange of properties. After talking matters over at Granger, the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Edwall v. JessephWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Matzger v. Arcade Building & Realty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
- Swash v. SharpsteinWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- Borrow v. BorrowWashington Supreme Court · 1904
- Johnson v. UpperWashington Supreme Court · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Henry S. Grinde Corporation v. KlindworthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
- State Ex Rel. Wirt v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Richardson v. Taylor Land & Livestock Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1946
- Keeler v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Marshall v. Hillman Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.