Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Keeler v. Murphy

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 6, 1931No. Docket No. 7620PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLING, J., pro tem.

Appellants were the owners of the leasehold and furnishings of the Ramona Hotel in San Francisco. Being desirous of disposing of these properties they entered into negotiations with respondents, who were real estate brokers. Respondents secured an offer from one Swanson to exchange a ranch owned by him for appellants’ hotel properties. This offer took the form of a writing embodying an agreement to exchange the properties upon terms set out therein, which was signed by Swanson and transmitted by respondents to appellants for their signatures. Instead of signing this…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pearsall v. HenryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Toomy v. DunphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Moore v. BorgfeldtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Henehan v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Kuhns v. GatesIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Smith v. BearCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  2. Buffalo Arms, Inc. v. Remler Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. D. L. Godbey & Sons Construction Co. v. DeaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Schwartz v. ShapiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. McKinney v. City of AbileneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API