Legal Opinion

State v. Anderson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 22, 1963No. 581PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, C.J.

The sole question presented on this appeal is whether or not the warrant to which the defendant pleaded guilty to operating a gambling bouse was sufficient in form to charge the offense of operating such a house.

If a warrant avers facts which -constitute every element of an offense, it is not necessary that it be couched in the language of the statute. S. v. Tickle, 238 N.C. 206, 77 S.E. 2d 632; S. v. Wilson, 218 N.C. 769, 12 S.E. 2d 654.

Reference to a specific statute upon which the charge in a warrant is laid is not necessary to its validity. Likewise, where a warrant charges a criminal…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. HammondsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. State v. Morgan.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  4. State v. TickleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. State v. . WebsterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. State v. PinyatelloSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. State v. PenleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. OvertonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API