Legal Opinion

In Re Reback

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 31, 1986No. 83-1289Published

1Opinion of the Court

513 A.2d 226 (1986)

In re William REBACK and Charles C. Parsons, Members of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

No. 83-1289.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Argued En Banc September 18, 1985.

Decided July 31, 1986.

David Epstein, Washington, D.C., for respondents.

Elizabeth J. Branda, Asst. Bar Counsel, Washington, D.C., for Board on Professional Responsibility, petitioner (minority).

Joan Goldfrank, Executive Atty., Washington, D.C., for Board on Professional Responsibility, petitioner (majority).

Before PRYOR, Chief Judge, and NEBEKER, MACK, NEWMAN, FERREN, BELSON, TERRY,…

Also in this document: Dissent · Pryor; Dissent · Newman; Dissent · Terry.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. In Re RebackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. In Re RoundtreeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Matter of HauptDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Matter of SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API