Legal Opinion

United States v. Richard A. Gardner

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 26, 1988No. 87-2170PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ESCHBACH, Senior Circuit Judge.

This is a direct criminal appeal of the defendant’s two-count conviction for violating 47 U.S.C. § 553 1 by willfully and knowingly assisting in the unauthorized interception and reception of cable service. A jury convicted the defendant-appellant, Richard A. Gardner, for selling seven cable converter boxes, which are capable of receiving unauthorized cable service, to an informant for the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”). We affirm the conviction.

I

In the indictment, Gardner was charged with two separate incidents of selling cable converter boxes (“black…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. United States v. Leonard PatrickCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. United States v. WackerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. Michael J. Corbitt, Pulitzer Community Newspapers, Inc., Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  3. Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. YakubetsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Jim Gee and William C. Norris, Defendants-Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. William CherryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API