Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian Reservation v. Washington
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CHOY, Circuit Judge:
The State of Washington appeals from a district court declaratory judgment that the State is without jurisdiction to regulate or control fishing by non-Indians on the Col-ville Indian Reservation. Appellees are the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian Reservation (the Tribes), a federally recognized tribal organization. We reverse.
1. Statement of the Case
The Tribes and the United States Fish and Wild Life Service have sponsored a program to bolster sports fishing in reservation waters. The Fish and Wild Life Service stocks the lakes and tribal police regulate and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Jones v. Rath Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Moe v. Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead ReservationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- New York State Department of Social Services v. DublinoSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Schwartz v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mescalero Apache Tribe v. New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Lower Brule Sioux Tribe v. Southn DakotaDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1982
- Mescalero Apache Tribe v. State Of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. State of MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Grand Canyon Dories, Inc. v. Idaho Outfitters & Guides BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.