Legal Opinion
Grand Canyon Dories, Inc. v. Idaho Outfitters & Guides Board
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 7, 1983No. 81-3599PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Circuit Judge:
Grand Canyon Dories, Inc. (Grand Canyon Dories) conducts a commercial whitewater rafting operation on portions of the Snake River that flow through Idaho. The parties stipulated that the Snake River is a navigable body of water in the federal sense, that the United States Coast Guard, the Bureau of Land Management, and the National Forest Service all have jurisdiction over certain activities connected with Grand Canyon Dories’s Snake River expeditions, and that Grand Canyon Dories uses Idaho’s side of the river for both rafting and camping. The State of Idaho’s boundary…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Jones v. Rath Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1986
- Grand Canyon Dories, Inc. v. Idaho Outfitters And Guides BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983