Legal Opinion

State v. Clay

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided January 14, 1987No. 16188PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction on a charge of rape. The primary issue is whether the trial judge unduly pressured the jury to return a verdict after a deadlock was reported. We hold that he did.

The facts are straightforward. The state charged Norman H. Clay with raping a woman who was visiting the town of Atlanta, Idaho, during a community festival known as “Atlanta Daze.” The woman testified that Clay entered a cabin where she was sleeping and that he forced her to engage in intercourse. The prosecutor also called other women to testify, over objection, that…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. United States v. John Fioravanti, Nicholas Panaccione, and Angelo Pepe, Nicholas PanaccioneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
  5. People v. GainerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. RhoadesIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. O'NeilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  4. State v. PecorIdaho Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. State v. LeeIdaho Court of Appeals · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API