Legal Opinion

State v. Lee

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided April 3, 1998No. 23816PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PERRY, Judge.

Samuel M. Lee appeals from his judgments of conviction and sentences entered following a jury trial. Lee contends that the jury deliberation process was tainted by undue pressure and, consequently, the district court erred when it denied his motion for mistrial.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

A car was stolen from a parking lot in Emmett by an unknown man and woman. The ear was then sold to Juan Ramirez and Vincente Zapata. Approximately one month later, the police arrested Ramirez and Zapata, and they led the police to Lee and Melody Logan. Lee was charged with burglary, I.C. § 18-1401;…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Brasfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. State v. HedgerIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. CaudillIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. AtkinsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. CarlsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. State v. HoyleIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. PENTICOIdaho Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. John Doe v. State of IdahoIdaho Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. State v. BarlowMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API