Legal Opinion

Hualde Ranch Co. v. Beebe

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 15, 1935No. Civ. 1464PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

This is an action on a promissory note to recover judgment for the deficiency remaining after a sale of certain real property under a trust deed given to secure the note. The complaint set forth a copy of the note and all necessary averments in relation thereto and, in apparent anticipation of certain defenses, alleged that the note and the trust deed securing the same were given in connection with -a transaction whereby the plaintiff sold the real property in question to the defendants under a contract of sale followed by the closing of an escrow and the deeding of the property. Among other…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bell v. PleasantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Poirier v. GravelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Cordes v. HardingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  4. Kenison v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Weisbrod v. WeisbrodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  2. Caguas Co. v. MombilleSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1941
  3. Kester v. ReynoldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Caguas Co. v. MombilleSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API