Legal Opinion
Lunceford v. Houghtlin
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided May 31, 2005No. WD 64017PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Judge.
Kimbra and Christopher Lunceford appeal a summary judgment holding that a general release of one tortfeasor in a motorcycle accident also released two other torfeasors. Because there is a genuine dispute of material fact whether the release intended to release other tortfeasors and as to whether the release was capable of reformation on grounds of mistake by the parties to the release, we conclude that it was error to grant summary judgment.
In May 2002 Kimbra and Christopher Lunceford were injured in a motorcycle accident. After settling with Christopher Lunceford’s…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Andes v. AlbanoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Twin River Construction Co. v. Public Water District No. 6Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Liberty v. JA Tobin Construction Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1974
- Smith v. GithensMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Brown v. MickelsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- Brittany Hunter v. Charles Moore, Sr.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2016
- Lunceford v. HoughtlinMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Husch & Eppenberger, LLC v. EisenbergMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Will Investments, Inc. v. YoungMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.