Legal Opinion
Chadwick v. Covell
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 27, 1890PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.
This is a suit brought for an injunction and damages in respect of the defendant’s manufacture and sale of certain medicines under the name of “ Dr. Spencer’s Queen of Pain,” and “ Spinal Paste or Salt Rheum Cure,” and his use of alleged trade-marks for the same. Issues were framed for the jury on the question whether the plaintiff was the owner of the formulas for the medicines and of the trade-marks used by Dr. Spencer, and these issues came on for trial. As the whole case was pending in the Superior Court, it is hardly to be supposed that it was understood that every question except those…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Menendez v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Goodyear's India Rubber Glove Manufacturing Co. v. Goodyear Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Peabody v. NorfolkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Kidd v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Stevens v. GladdingSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- William R. Warner & Co. v. Eli Lilly & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Brown Chemical Co. v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- L.L. Bean, Inc. v. Drake Publishers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Baseball Publishing Co. v. BrutonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Conmar Products Corp. v. Universal Slide Fastener Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.