Legal Opinion
Martin v. Burris
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 22, 1922No. Civ. No. 2443PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.
The complaint alleges the execution of a contract on November 17, 1916, by the terms of which the parties associated “themselves together for the purpose of acquiring, disposing of and working mining properties in the Masonic Mining District in the County of Mono”; that certain mining properties were acquired pursuant to the agreement; that the plaintiff performed all the terms of the agreement on his part; that the defendant failed to perform any of the terms thereof and endeavored to prevent performance by plaintiff, to plaintiff’s damage in the sum of $10,000; that on the twenty-ninth day…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Saunders v. McDonoughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- First Nat. Bank of Amarillo v. RushTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
- Keyes v. NimsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Jackson v. HooperNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1909
- Botsford v. Van RiperNevada Supreme Court · 1910
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Thompson v. DuncanTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- Hooper v. BarrantiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Walsh v. Atlantic Research Associates, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Danelian v. McLoneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Hill v. HearronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.