Legal Opinion

State v. Laible

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1999No. 20334PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KONENKAMP, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Defendant, Ben Laible, appeals a jury verdict finding him guilty but mentally ill of second degree murder. He asserts multiple evidentiary and constitutional errors in his trial. We affirm on all issues.

Facts

[¶ 2.] Kathleen Laible, a sixty-seven-year-old widow, lived on her farm near Howard, South Dakota. In August 1996, her adult son, Ben, moved back in with her. It was not the first time. Over the years he often stayed with her for extended periods. Although she loved all her children, she felt especially protective of her “Benny.” He suffered from long-term mental…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Godfrey v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Baxstrom v. HeroldSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. State v. Bad Heart BullSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  2. State v. RodriquezSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  3. Meinders v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Goetz v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. HuberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API