R. M. Newell Co. v. Rice
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Upon our review of the pleadings, the parties’ submissions and the controlling authorities, we conclude that certain of plaintiff’s claims against the various defendants cannot be sustained in law or fact, and that, with respect to those, the court erred in denying defendants’ motions for dismissal or summary judgment. Accordingly, we modify the order appealed from to dismiss the following claims: as against defendant Fisher, the claim that it wrongfully terminated its contract with plaintiff; as against defendant Process, the claim that it wrongfully induced Fisher to terminate its contract…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Guard-Life Corp. v. S. Parker Hardware Manufacturing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Foley v. D'AgostinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Alexander & Alexander of New York, Inc. v. FritzenNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Pace v. PerkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Hutchins v. GorlickiNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- R. M. Newell Co. v. RiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Kantor v. BernsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Norstar Bank of Upstate New York v. Bennett Funding GroupAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990