Kantor v. Bernstein
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*501Fairly construed, the amended complaint alleges that defendant partner, prior to dissolution, went to defendant law firm and offered them virtually all of plaintiff’s class action arbitration practice in exchange for making him a partner in the defendant firm, and that defendant partner’s pre-resignation discussions with his prospective new firm included a surreptitious pre-resignation agreement that defendant firm would assist defendant partner in concealing the true nature of their actions from plaintiff until his resignation. This constitutes an adequate pleading of a breach of defendant…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Graubard Mollen Dannett & Horowitz v. MoskovitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Weintraub v. Phillips, Nizer, Benjamin, Krim, & BallonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Shah v. ShahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Saunder v. BaryshnikovAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Mance v. ManceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- William Kaufman Organization, Ltd. v. Graham & James L. L. P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- DeStaso v. Condon Resnick, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Costalas v. AmalfitanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Daniel v. SafirDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2001
- Weinberg v. SultanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.