Legal Opinion

Candee v. Candee

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 2019No. 20180246PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Crothers, Justice.

*424[¶1] Keith Candee appeals from an order entered on remand denying his motion for contractual attorney fees and costs. Because the parties' settlement agreement and mutual release of claims is not "evidence of debt" under N.D.C.C. § 28-26-04, the district court misapplied the law in holding the parties' contractual provision providing for attorney fees was against public policy and void. The court abused its discretion in its decision denying his motion for attorney fees and we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

I

[¶2] This appeal involves the continued litigation…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Berg v. BergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Farmers Union Oil Co. of New England v. MaixnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. T.F. James Company v. VakochNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,268 United States of America v. Ronnie JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  5. Cheetah Properties 1, LLC v. Panther Pressure Testers, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Twete v. MullinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Big Pines v. BakerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Candee v. CandeeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API