Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Washington-Oregon Investment Co. v. Dobson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1942PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

We took jurisdiction in this original proceeding in mandamus for the purpose of determining whether, under existing .legislation, the defendant in an action in the small claims department of the district court of Multnomah county has a right of appeal from the judgment of that court to the circuit court. The relator, Washington-Oregon Investment Company, a corporation, attempted to appeal from such a judgment in the amount of $12 and costs, but its appeal was dismissed by the circuit court. Since no other remedy is open to the relator (see, State ex rel. v. Kanzler, 129 Or. 85, 93, 97, 276 P.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. The PalmyraSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  2. United States v. ClaflinSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Town of South Ottawa v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. United States v. GillisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. District of Columbia v. HuttonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. SEALE v. McKennonOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Legat v. AdornoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  3. PETERS v. McKAYOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Simmons v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  5. Northern Wasco County People's Utility District v. Wasco CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1957

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API