Legal Opinion

Town of South Ottawa v. Perkins

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 26, 1877No. 58PublishedCited by 128 opinions

Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois. The facts áre stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Beadlex

The first of these actions was brought by Perkins, the plaintiff below, to recover the amount due upon two negotiable bonds of the town of South Ottawa, in the usual form, for $1,000 each, made payable to the Ottawa, Oswego, and Fox River Yalley Railroad Company, or bearer, in three years from July 1, 1869, with coupons for the semi-annual payment of interest attached. They each contained recitals as follows: —

“ This bond is one of a series of twenty bonds, bearing even date herewith, each for the sum of $1,000, . . . and is issued in pursu. *262anco of an election held in said town, on the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Town of Coloma v. EavesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Spangler v. JacobyIllinois Supreme Court · 1853
  3. Pendleton County v. AmySupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  4. Prentice v. PickersgillSupreme Court of the United States · 1868

3Cited by128 opinions

  1. United States National Bank v. Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Chastleton Corp. v. SinclairSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API