LG Display Co., Ltd. v. AU Optronics Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FARNAN, District Judge.
By previously entered Opinion and Order, the Court concluded that AUO established that LGD infringes AUO’s asserted patents: U.S. Patent No. 6,778,160 (claims 1 and 3) (the “'160 patent”); U.S. Patent No. 6,689,629 (claims 7 and 16) (the “'629 patent”); U.S. Patent No. 7,125,157 (claim 1) (the “'157 patent”) and U.S. Patent No. 7,090,506 (claims 7 and 17) (the “'506 patent”). This Memorandum Opinion constitutes the Court’s findings and conclusions related to the issues of willful infringement and damages.
DISCUSSION
I. Whether AUO Has Established that…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Micro Chemical, Inc. v. Lextron, Inc. And Turnkey Computer Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Smithkline Diagnostics, Inc. v. Helena Laboratories Corporation, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Idenix Pharmaceuticals LLC v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2017
- Amgen Inc. v. Hospira, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2018
- Norman v. ElkinDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2010
- Green Mountain Glass LLC v. Saint-Gobain Containers, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2018
- Abbott Biotechnology Ltd. v. Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.