Legal Opinion

Barnes v. City of Hillsboro

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 24, 2010No. 2010011; A146145PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Intervenor Port of Portland and respondent City of Hillsboro (respondents) petition for judicial review of an order of the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) in which LUBA reversed Ordinance 5935, the city’s ordinance that “amend[ed] the city zoning map to apply the city’s Airport Use * * * zone to the Hillsboro Airport and the city’s Airport Safety and Compatibility Overlay * * * zone to surrounding properties.” 1 2 In reversing Ordinance 5935, LUBA concluded that a separate, unappealed ordinance — viz., Ordinance 5926, which established those airport-related zones— violated federal and state…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Peeples v. LampertOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Beall Transport Equipment Co. v. Southern Pacific TransportationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. Beall Transport Equipment Co. v. Southern Pacific TransportationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. Daniel v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Barnes v. United States Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. Barnes v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. Willamette Oaks, LLC v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  4. Waste Not of Yamhill County v. Yamhill CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  5. Barnes v. United States Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API