Legal Opinion

Stecyk v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 21, 1999No. CIV A 94-1818PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER-MEMORANDUM

EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.

AND NOW this 21th day of June, 1999, upon .consideration of Michelle Stecyk’s petition for approval of the Settlement for the benefit of her minor son, a supplement petition (doc. no. 304), and following two hearings at which evidence was received, and a scheduling conference with counsel for the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that the petitions are DENIED IN PART AND GRANTED IN PART.

It is further ORDERED that the proceeds of the settlement shall be apportioned and distributed as follows: 1

1) Mattioni Ltd. for counsel fees: $467,905.56

2) Under…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. LaRocca EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Slaseman v. MyersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Union Ink Co., Inc. v. AT&T CORP.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
  4. Blue v. BlueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. GILMORE BY GILMORE v. DonderoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Nice v. Centennial Area School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Johnson v. Clearfield Area School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Schalliol v. FareDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. ESTATE OF RYAN ECKELBERRY v. CSX TRANSPORATION, INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. G.L. v. SEAWORLD PARKS & ENTERTAINMENT, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API